Legal Opinion
State v. De Rosia
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 9, 2004No. 28467-7-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
100 P.3d 331 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
David Eugene DE ROSIA, Appellant.
No. 28467-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 9, 2004.
Suzan L. Clark, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Appellant.
Thomas C. Duffy, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.
HUNT, J.
David DeRosia appeals his Alford[1] plea conviction for second degree felony murder predicated on second degree child assault. He argues that State v. Andress[2] compels vacation of his conviction and withdrawal of his plea. The State counters that State v. Majors[3] binds DeRosia to his guilty plea,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- In Re Personal Restraint Petition of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.