United States v. Pittsley
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, Chief Judge.
The motion to dismiss the counterclaim is to be allowed. If there is doubt whether a counterclaim may be filed against the United States it is better to have it determined at once in order that the defendants’ rights to file an original suit may not be carried beyond the period of the statute of limitations. It seems clear from a review of the sovereign’s immunity from suit that any waiver of such immunity cannot be accomplished except by language which is clear and explicit. I find no language in the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Donovan v. McKennaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Graske v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- United States v. Vernon Cab Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- United States v. New York City Omnibus Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955