Legal Opinion

United States v. Pittsley

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 13, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 7752PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

The motion to dismiss the counterclaim is to be allowed. If there is doubt whether a counterclaim may be filed against the United States it is better to have it determined at once in order that the defendants’ rights to file an original suit may not be carried beyond the period of the statute of limitations. It seems clear from a review of the sovereign’s immunity from suit that any waiver of such immunity cannot be accomplished except by language which is clear and explicit. I find no language in the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donovan v. McKennaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graske v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  2. United States v. Vernon Cab Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
  3. United States v. New York City Omnibus Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API