Legal Opinion

State v. Steed

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2015No. Case No. 20110441PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURRANT,

opinion of the Court:

Introduction

1 In this appeal, we are asked to decide the constitutionality of Utah's Asset Preservation Statute. But in order to reach this issue, we must first consider whether Ms. Steed's claims are justiciable. Generally, if the requested judicial relief cannot affect the rights of the parties, the case is moot and we will not hear it. Ms. Steed has conceded her claims are technically moot: But she argues that our mootness exception applies. Under this exception, we will hear a technically moot case if it affects the public interest, is likely to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Baird v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Utah Transit Authority v. Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. H.U.F. v. W.P.W.Utah Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Timothy v. Pia Anderson Dorius Reynard MossUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. LeggCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  4. Teamsters Local 222 v. Utah Transit Auth.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Poulton v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API