Teamsters Local 222 v. Utah Transit Auth.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Associate Chief Justice Lee, opinion of the Court:
¶1 A group of supervisors working for Utah Transit Authority (UTA) coordinated with a labor organization in an effort to unionize. When UTA resisted, the union and supervisors filed an action seeking a declaration of their right to organize. The district court then entered a non-final order concluding that the supervisors had collective bargaining rights under Utah law. Thereafter, however, the supervisors voted not to unionize. That ended the controversy before the district court ever entered a final judgment. And at that point the case…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Timothy v. Pia Anderson Dorius Reynard MossUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Northgate Village Development, LC v. Orem CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Widdison v. Bd of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Haney v. Tooele CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2025
- Motorola v. Procurement Policy Bd.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.