Legal Opinion
H. G. Skidmore v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 26, 1979No. 79-7210PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appeal pro se from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissing a complaint. The complaint sought judicial review, pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 153 First (q), of an order of the National Rail Adjustment Board, Third Division (NRAB), which denied appellant certain rail passes to which he claimed entitlement under a labor agreement between his union and Conrail, and also denied reimbursement for costs incurred by appellant in earlier grievance proceedings.
Appellant had sought similar relief in pri- or cases in the district courts, and the instant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Wicks v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company v. Marie BlackettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, and United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Michael G. Radin v. United States of America and National Mediation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United Transportation Union v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Ollman v. Special Board of Adjustment No. 1063Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Joel Myron v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.