Legal Opinion
Aurre v. Kalaigan (In Re Aurre)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1986No. 19-10206PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HOWARD C. BUSCHMAN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.
The defendant seeks an order granting summary judgment pursuant to Rule 7056 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (1983), which incorporates Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“F.R.C.P.”) (1983). She further requests that sanctions be imposed against the plaintiff and his attorneys pursuant to Rule 9011 of the Bankruptcy Rules. Alternatively she demands that security for costs be posted pursuant to Local Rule 39 of the Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Upon a motion…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hohenberg v. Hohenberg (In Re Hohenberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1992
- Buccino v. BuccinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Richards v. Richards (In Re Richards)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Rosenbaum v. Cummings (In Re Rosenbaum)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1993
- Portaro v. Portaro (In Re Portaro)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.