Super Products Corp. v. D P Way Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim asserted against it. All issues raised by the motion, except that of the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction, have been disposed of in a prior order. The issue presented is whether this counterclaim is asserted under Rule 13(a) or 13(b). If it is a Rule 13(a) compulsory counterclaim, this Court may assert ancillary jurisdiction over it. If the claim be permissive, however, there must be an independent basis for federal jurisdiction.
Rule 13 defines a compulsory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- The Kissell Company v. Emmanuel R. Farley and Alta Nell Farley, Cross-Defendants-Appellees v. James P. Farley, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Hy-Way Heat Systems, Inc. v. Jadair, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minnetonka, Inc. v. Sani-Fresh International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986