Hill v. State

There is no semblance of error in any of the several rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence to which exceptions were reserved. This is so clearly apparent no discussion of the insistences in this connection is necessary. The record proper is also free from error.

The accusation against appellant was a violation .of the prohibition law by having whisky in his .possession. The prosecution originated in the county court, and, from a judgment of conviction in that court, án"appeal' was taken to the circuit court' where' the case was tried by a jury. A question, of .fact only was…