Legal Opinion
Sun Co. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1997No. 96-5222PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
For the third time in as many years, we are faced with the task of further defining and clarifying the relationship between §§ 107 and 113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 and 9613. See United States v. Colorado & Eastern R.R., 50 F.3d 1530 (10th Cir.1995); Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kansas, 100 F.3d 792 (10th Cir.), as amended, 103 F.3d 80 (1996). Plaintiffs Sun Company and texases brought this action under both §§ 107 and 113 for costs expended in cleaning up a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United Technologies Corporation v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Akzo Coatings, Incorporated, and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- County Line Investment Company And, Wagco Land Development, Inc. v. Calvin L. TinneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Geraghty & Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Gencorp, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Olin Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Illinois, Inc. v. Richard Ter MaatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.