Caveny v. Raven Arms Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS.
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This matter came on for consideration of defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 5), plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition (doc. 16), defendant’s reply memorandum (doc. 18), plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint (doc. 17) and defendant’s memorandum in opposition (doc. 21).
Initially, we grant plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint. Defendant claims its motion for judgment on the pleadings only relates to the claims in plaintiffs’ original complaint.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tanya Copier, Deceased, by and Through Bree Renee Lindsey, Her Personal Representative v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Perkins v. Wilkinson Sword, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Halliday v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Delahanty v. HinckleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Eimann v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.