Shanahan v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
FACTS 1
Plaintiff Michael Shanahan brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the consent decree entered in Shakman v. Democratic Org. of Cook County, 481 F.Supp. 1315, 1356-59 (N.D.Ill.1979) (“Shakman decree”) alleging that he was demoted in viola*537tion of the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Shakmcm decree. Shanahan contends that he was demoted because he refused to hire machinists who were allegedly political supporters of Mayor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Connie M. Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.