Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Dace

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1988No. 54322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

This appeal arises after a directed verdict for defendant property owners in an action brought by Matthew W. Vogt to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when he fell through a hole in the front porch of the home of Vernon and Sharon Dace. The court granted the Daces’ motion for directed verdict filed at the close of plaintiffs case.

Matthew Vogt appeals the judgment for defendants on two grounds: 1) the trial court erred in finding as a matter of law Matthew Vogt was a trespasser and not a licensee or invitee, and as such was not owed a duty of due care by the Daces;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rustici v. WeidemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Wells v. GoforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Singleton v. Charlebois Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Davis v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Ferguson v. GinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harter v. Ozark-Kenworth, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. C. Russell Gould v. United States of America, William R. Zanetello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Gould v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
  4. C. Russell Gould v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API