In Re Sulzmann, Sheriff
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
It was conceded on trial by the sheriff and his counsel, and is conceded here, that horse racing took place at the places and times alleged in the complaint, and that systematic wagering was conducted in connection with such racing. The sheriff testified that he had knowledge of such racing "just by report, rumor and common knowledge." The sheriff also stated that he issued permits to North Randall, Cranwood, and Thistledown race tracks to operate for a limited time, and refused a permit to other race tracks in Cuyahoga county to operate. His testimony on this point was as follows:
"A. Mr.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- South v. Maryland Ex Rel. PottleSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- State ex rel. Thompson v. ReichmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Scougale v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Sonner v. DeanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Keith Crabbs v. Zach ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Brownstown Township v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. AmmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- State v. RouseOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.