Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kulp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1973No. Appeal, 310PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant contends that the court below erred in refusing to issue a writ of habeas corpus and ordering his extradition to Texas.

Pennsylvania courts will only order an extradition if: (1) “the subject of the extradition is charged with a crime in the demanding state”; (2) the subject “was present in the demanding state at the time” the crime charged was committed; (3) the subject is a fugitive from the demanding state; and, (4) “the requisition papers are in order.” Commonwealth ex rel. Dronsfield v. Hohn, 390 Pa. 434, 436, 135 A. 2d 757 (1957).

Appellant argues that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WhitingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. United States Ex Rel. Anthony Vitiello v. Walter J. Flood, Warden of the Nassau County JailCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Luker v. KochSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. GlavinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Martin v. State of MarylandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Colcough v. AytchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coleman v. CuylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Berry v. AytchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Holland v. HargarIndiana Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API