Legal Opinion

Nails v. LaPlante

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 26, 2009No. Case 3:07-cv-1017 (SRU)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.

Johnny Nails, currently confined at the Osborn Correctional Institution in Somers, Connecticut, commenced this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Nails alleges that the defendants, Drs. Sharron Laplante and James McKenna, were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs and violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted.

I. Standard of Review

The burden is on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Elbert v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Aviles v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  3. Barfield v. CookDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  4. Barry J. Arpin v. Dr. Bryan Kennedy, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
  5. Campbell v. LupisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API