Legal Opinion

Inman Ex Rel. Henderson v. South Carolina Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1990No. 1452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The issue before us in this declaratory judgment action is whether the late Janie Henderson was á “relative” of the insured within the meaning of former Section 56-9-810(2) of the South Carolina Code of Laws (1976). 1 The trial court found she was not the insured’s “relative” within the meaning of the statute and granted summary judgment to the defendants South Carolina Insurance Company and Seibels Bruce Insurance Company. Nancy Inman, as Administratrix of Henderson’s estate, appeals. We affirm.

On August 27, 1987, an uninsured motorist struck and killed Henderson while she was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Liprie v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. United States Leasing Corp. v. Janicare, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Hunter Ex Rel. Estate of Thompson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Foster v. Greenville County Medical SocietyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BoydDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
  2. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. BoydDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API