Legal Opinion
Pearlman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1927No. 5058PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The first count of the indictment charged that “on June 1, 1925, the real and exact date of which is unknown to the grand jury, and continuously at all times thereafter,” the plaintiff in error and Wiley, Prink, and Holman conspired to violate section 3, tit. 2, of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138%aa), in that they would buy, sell, barter, transport, keep, possess, and deal in intoxicating liquors, and it alleged three overt acts, the first of which was that on or about Juno 1, 1925, at Portland, Or., the plaintiff in error made arrangements with Holman…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawlor v. LoeweSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- United States v. RileyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Poliafico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Wyman Hulan Parr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- State v. LawsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.