Legal Opinion

In re Washington

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1996No. 94-2126PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issues before this court are whether a rebuttable presumption exists that a child under the age of fourteen is incapable of committing the crime of rape and whether sufficient evidence existed to support the trial court’s finding that appellee was delinquent. For the following reasons, we find that (1) no such presumption exists in Ohio, and (2) in the present case the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s finding that appellee was delinquent. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment.

In determining the legal sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In re M.D.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re BurtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In re J.T.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In re D.L.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. In re WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In re SpencerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API