Legal Opinion

Flowers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1944No. 1 Div. 468PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

Upon an indictment for vagrancy, appellant was convicted of being the keeper or proprietor of a bawdy house, as prescribed by Subdivision (10), Section 437, Title 14, Code of 1940.

The principal evidence proffered by the State was the testimony of one of the raiding officers that, on two separate occasions when he visited the house, he found a man and woman undressed in one of the cabins, and that they were not married. To prove that these two couples were unmarried, the officer was allowed to testify, over due objection and exception, that the couples had' given him statements…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Rainey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Benjamin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spencer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API