Legal Opinion

Heine v. Raus

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 8, 1966No. Civ. 15952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This is an action for slander in which defendant’s motion for summary judgment asserts the defense of absolute privilege on the ground that when he made certain defamatory statements he was acting within the scope and course of his employment by the Central Intelligence Agency on behalf of the United States, and had been instructed by the CIA to warn members of Estonian emi- gré groups that plaintiff was a dispatched Soviet intelligence operative, a KGB agent.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment raises a number of substantive and procedural questions. The matter is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eerik Heine v. Juri RausCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  2. Blum v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  3. Heine v. RausDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
  4. Progressive Securities, Inc. v. YoungDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1967
  5. Grossman v. McKayDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API