Legal Opinion

Benhoff v. Sherman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 6, 2020No. 3:19-cv-02191Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS MICHAEL BENHOFF, Case No.: 19cv2191-GPC-MDD 12 Petitioner, REPORT AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 STU SHERMAN, Warden, RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 15 Respondent. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 16 17 [ECF No. 7] 18 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States 19 District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil 20 Local Rule 72.1(c) of the United States District Court for the Southern 21 District of California. 22 For the reasons set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Raymond Ross v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API