Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Anselm & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCoyne, J.
Motion by defendant corporation for a change of venue from Westchester County to New York County. Plaintiff assignee is a resident of Westchester County. The claim sued on was assigned to plaintiff by a Massachusetts corporation. Defendant is a Delaware corporation duly authorized to do business in the State of New York. The residence of the plaintiff assignee in Westchester County, of itself, does not place the venue of the cause here. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 184-a.) In support of the motion, defendant corporation contends that as a foreign corporation authorized to do business in New York, it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mills & Gibb (Inc.) v. StarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Shepard & Morse Lumber Co. v. BurleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Williams v. A. Hollander & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Dan W. Feitel Bag Co. v. BobinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sterling Factors Corp. v. Sad Sam's Furnitureland of Binghamton, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960