Legal Opinion
Acme Markets, Inc. v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ANNETTE PILVALIS)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 1991No. 1803 C.D. 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
142 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 400 (1991)
597 A.2d 294
ACME MARKETS, INC., Petitioner,
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ANNETTE PILVALIS), Respondent.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted on Briefs November 30, 1990.
Decided September 16, 1991.
Matthew D. Dempsey, for petitioner.
Jerome L. Cohen, for respondent.
Before DOYLE and BYER, JJ., and BARRY, Senior Judge.
DOYLE, Judge.
This is an appeal by Acme Markets Inc. (Employer) from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a referee[1] denying the petition of Employer to modify/terminate benefits…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.