Legal Opinion

Edward & Walter v. Enterprise Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 30, 1910No. 7676PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before C. C. Frati-iRrstonr, Special Judge, Faurens, May, 1909. Action by Edwards & Walters against Enterprise Bank. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Messrs. Dial & Todd cite: Evidence of value of services incompetent: 16 S. C., 192; 22 Ency., 1376-8; 48 S. C., 298.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chirp Justice Jones.

The plaintiffs, who are architects, brought this action to recover a balance of $571.22, alleged to be due them by defendant for drawing plans and specifications, inspecting and advising as to bids, and supervising the construction of defendant’s bank building, alleging that defendant had agreed to pay plaintiffs for their services five per cent, of the gross cost of the building, including ornamental plaster, electric wiring, heating, bank furniture and plumbing; that the gross cost of the building was $31,424.50. The complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Birlant v. CleckleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chandler v. People's National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Crawford v. Rice & Hutchins Baltimore Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Stanton v. YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  4. Stanton v. YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API