Legal Opinion

Fidelity Bank v. King

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 16, 2006No. 92,410PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BEIER, J.:

This foreclosure appeal requires us to determine whether a junior mortgage holder waives its claim to excess sheriffs sale proceeds if it fails to appear and assert its position in a senior mortgage holder’s action. We hold that it does.

Defendants James and Carolyn King assumed the debt on certain real property in Wichita in 1997. Fidelity Bank, 1/k/a Fidelity Savings Associations of Kansas, FSB (Fidelity), was the mortgage holder. In 2000, the Kings executed a second mortgage on the property with U.S. Bank, N.A. (U.S. Bank), for $32,000. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noel Ex Rel. Noel v. Menninger FoundationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Cardarella v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. McFall v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. First National Bank & Trust v. Miami County Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Ellis v. SouthwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.D.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Martinez v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (In Re Martinez)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  3. CITIFINANCIAL MORTG. CO., INC. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. Myers v. Lincoln Center Ob/Gyn, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. RooneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API