Legal Opinion

Booth v. Weiser Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1987No. 16545PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Appellant, Weiser Irrigation District (WID), appeals a district court decision holding that respondents Clayton and Cheryl Booth (Booth), and Robert and Donna Stout, Billy Jo and Carol Ann Youngblood, and Kenneth and Frances Youngblood (pro se respondents), are entitled to 250 inches of water each year pursuant to an 1890 contract between the parties’ predecessors in interest.

The dispute began in 1977 when drought conditions made water scarce in the Weiser River Watershed. At that time WID demanded that Booth, who had been receiving water from the district for 87 years, shut…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Furness v. ParkIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc. v. Travelers Leasing Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Matter of Estate of RollIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Johnson v. EdwardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Etcheverry Sheep Co. v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API