Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Kroha

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 2016No. 5D15-2364PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court entered a default judgment after Appellants (defendants below) 1 filed a motion to dismiss and motion to clarify instead of an answer, as they had been ordered to do. This was an abuse of discretion. Osheroff v. Osheroff, 694 So.2d 855 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Although the better practice to challenge this error would have been a direct appeal, there is authority that it may be challenged by a motion to vacate the judgment. Thaw, Gopman & Assocs., P.A. v. Jack J. Greenberg, M.D. & Assocs., P.A., 595 So.2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osheroff v. OsheroffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Thaw, Gopman & Associates, P.A. v. Jack J. Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mtw Jordan Inc., Jordan Ave. Management, Inc., Markee White and v. Tnt Educators, Inc. D/B/A Apple Academy, Tanya Baskerville & Waltrell LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API