Legal Opinion

Thaw, Gopman & Associates, P.A. v. Jack J. Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1992No. 91-2759PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the order denying the motion to vacate default filed by defendants Thaw, Gopman & Assoc., P.A., and Ronald Thaw. Under the circumstances of this case, the submission of motions to modify a stay and to dismiss the complaint instead of an answer as provided in the trial court’s order does not merit entry of a default. Joseph v. Marese, 534 So.2d 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Techno Indus. Corp. v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 410 So.2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Techno Indus. Corp. v. Cooper Indus., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Joseph v. MareseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osheroff v. OsheroffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Pierce v. KrohaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016