Legal Opinion

Kitsap County v. Moore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2001No. 70119-9PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

— Indigent defendants have a right to appointed counsel on appeal from courts of limited jurisdiction to superior court. Traditionally, local governments pay those fees, as well as the other costs of representation. Kitsap County and the City of Bremerton (Kitsap and Bremerton) are seeking a writ of mandamus requiring the director of the Office of Public Defense to reimburse those expenses incurred since 1996 and requiring a commitment to pay those expenses in the future. Kitsap and Bremerton contend RCW 4.88.330 demonstrates a legislative intent to commit the state (as opposed to the local…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Sehome Park Care Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Alderwood Water District v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTHWashington Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. SOUND TRANSIT AUTH.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Thurston Cnty. Ex Rel. Snaza v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Lewis County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API