Termination of Parental Rights of John Doe (2014-25)
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
This is an expedited appeal from a magistrate court’s judgment terminating John Doe’s parental rights and allowing his son C.C. to be adopted. Doe argues that the magistrate court did not have jurisdiction to hear the case. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Doe and C.C.’s mother (Mother) are the biological parents of C.C., who was born in 2008. Doe, Mother, and C.C. are all members of the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation (Tribes). Doe and Mother were never married, but lived together sporadically during the initial portion of C.C.’s life until…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Doe v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. YzaguirreIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Bankers Life Insurance v. Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, P.S.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Stiffler v. Hydroblend, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- IDHW v. Jane Doe (2022-36)Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Liberty Bankers Life Insurance v. Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, P.S.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.