Legal Opinion

Doe v. Mann

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2005No. 04-15477PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

415 F.3d 1038

Mary DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Arthur MANN, in his official capacity; Robert L. Crone, Jr., in his official capacity; Lake County Superior Court; Department of Social Services, Lake County; D., Mrs.; D., Mr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-15477.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted October 6, 2004.

Filed July 19, 2005.

Marc A. Le Forestier, Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Sacramento, CA; Cameron L. Reeves, County Counsel, Robert L. Weiss, Deputy County Counsel, Lake County, Lakeport, CA, Alicia C. Park, Soter & Park, Attorneys at Law, San…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. K2 America Corp. v. Roland Oil & Gas, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. A.D.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. In Re EstherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Marlene C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Burgess, Steven J. v. Watters, SteveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API