Legal Opinion · Dissent

Palmer v. Palmer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 2013No. 1D11-5663Published

1DissentMakar, J.

At issue is whether a court in a divorce proceeding must enforce an illegal penalty clause contained in a supplemental agreement to which both parties agreed. The former husband, who raises a number of other issues, argues that he should not be required to pay the penalties to which he agreed as formalized in the supplemental judgment below. I concur in affirmance as to the other issues raised, but would reverse and remand with instructions to determine actual damages for the former husband’s breach.

I. Background

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in a final judgment entered on May 30, 2008.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Varner v. VarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Crosby Forrest Products, Inc. v. ByersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Willner v. WillnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Miller v. PreeferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Jessen v. JessenWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API