Legal Opinion

Georgia Power Company v. Fletcher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1966No. 41919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

We affirm. Headnote 1 needs no elaboration.

The sole question for decision is whether the lessee has breached the terms of his lease in placing 24 acres of the leased land in the Voluntary Cropland Adjustment Program of the United States Department of Agriculture. If he has, there can be no question that the lessor was entitled to cancel the lease and take possession. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Davis, 47 Ga. App. 601 (1) (171 SE 150); Sinclair Refining Co. v. Giddens, 54 Ga. App. 69 (6) (187 SE 201).

The lease was expressly for the purpose of “farming only” and so the question…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Sinclair Refining Co. v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Collins v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Service Merchandise Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000
  2. Gill v. Prehistoric Ponds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Beckanstin v. Public Savings Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Fletcher v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. J & C POULTRY v. Reyes-GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API