Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Seagraves

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 12, 1992Published

1DissentDwyer, Judge

I cannot agree with the majority’s reversal of this conviction, based on the tenets of Rule 12(b)(2) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure, other established precedents of law, and lastly, the fact that any error at all here was unassigned. In Johnson v. U.S., 318 U.S. 189, 63 S.Ct. 549, 87 *622L.Ed. 704 (1943), the following language may be found:

To turn a criminal appeal into a quest for error no more promotes the ends of justice than to acquiesce in low standards of criminal prosecution.

Id., 318 U.S. at 202, 63 S.Ct. at 555 (Frankfurter, J. concurring).

After the parties had submitted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State v. FooteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  3. State v. DavidsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. State v. HixCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  5. State v. FarmerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API