Legal Opinion

Munson v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1996No. 21509, 21527PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

This case involves the consolidation of two separate cases, Munson v. State, Docket No. 21509 and Anderson v. State, Docket No. 21527. Both cases raise as the sole issue on appeal, whether the district court erred in ruling that the mailbox rule does not apply to a pro se inmate’s filing of a petition for post-conviction relief.

I

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

The facts are undisputed in both Munson v. State and Anderson v. State. Both of the appellants, John Dennis Munson and Richard James Anderson, have stipulated that the legislature’s 1993 amendment of I.C. § 19-4902,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. LaFon v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. FarwellIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Massaline v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. In Re CarlstadWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. GorackeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API