Hubbell v. Kingman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit for a foreclosure of a judgment lien on real estate; brought to the Court of Common Pleas. The plaintiff demurred to the defendant’s answer, and the court (Hall, J!,) sustained the demurrer and rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
The plaintiff attached certain real estate as the property of Josephine Schering.. Afterwards Josephine Schering conveyed the property so attached to the defendant in this suit. In the case of Hubbell v. Schering the plaintiff was non-suited at the December term, 1881, of the Court of Common Pleas. During the same term the non-suit was set aside and the case restored to the docket. At the April term, 1882, the plaintiff recovered judgment for $14.84 damages, and for $289.67 costs. He thereupon filed and recorded a certificate of a judgment lien upon the *18real estate so attached. The present…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
- Lockwood v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- Butler v. BisselConnecticut Superior Court · 1785
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. HeggelundSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Loewe v. Savings Bank of DanburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Potter v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. GarofaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Gunnison v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.