Legal Opinion

Chiaverini v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting peremptory mandamus order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied. The relator failed to show that he had been appointed in compliance with the requirements of the municipal civil service commission’s rules; on the contrary, it affirmatively appears by the answering affidavit that there had been no such compliance on his part. Hence, he never had been legally appointed (Matter of Meehan v. Flaherty, 119 App. Div. 128; People v. Ingham, 107 id. 41), and even though the petitioner had served in the position to which he seeks reinstatement, that fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meehan v. FlahertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. People ex rel. Lee v. GleasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Welling v. FullenNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McInerney v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In re PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Burke v. HaydenNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API