Legal Opinion

Puget Soundkeeper All. v. Dep't of Ecology

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2018No. 94293-5PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

*634 ¶ 1 In this case, we are asked to decide whether Department of Ecology's current waste discharge permitting process complies with RCW 90.48.520 's requirement for "permit conditions [to] require all known , available, and reasonable methods to control toxicants in the applicant's wastewater." (Emphasis added.) No disagreement exists that Ecology uses the most sensitive testing method federally approved to monitor permit compliance. The issue in this case is whether RCW 90.48.520 requires Ecology to use a more sensitive testing method not recognized by Ecology or the United States…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruce v. Sellen Construction Co IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  2. City Of Everett v. Washington Public Relations Commission & Iaff Local 46Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Northwest Pulp & Paper Assoc. V. Department Of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Petrogas Pacific Llc, Et Ano., V. Rebecca XczarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  5. Puget Soundkeeper Alliance, V. State Of Wa Pollution Control HearingsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API