Legal Opinion

United States v. Faisca

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 12, 1996No. ARMY 9401331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARROLL, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of larceny of military property (two specifications) in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence consisting of confinement for two months, reduction to Private E1, and a bad-conduct discharge.

This case is before the court for automatic review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ. We have reviewed the record of trial, the assignment of error and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FaiscaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. MosleyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API