Legal Opinion

Ross v. Kan-Tex Seed Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1996No. 85140Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUETTNER, Judge:

This case has previously been before this Court on the question of liability. In No. 80,465, Division I of the Oklahoma Court of Appeals found that the tenant of Appellee’s land, under a grazing lease, held no more than a license for grazing livestock on the land. Consequently, when the tenant contracted with Appellant Kan-Tex Seed Co. (“Kan-Tex”) to sell the native grass seed *1086growing on the land, the result was that Kan-Tex was liable for conversion of the seed. Division I remanded the case to the trial court for an award of appropriate damages in favor of Appellee.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Maras v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Hamco Oil and Drilling Company v. ErvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Haines v. ParraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Lukenbill v. Longfellow CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API