Legal Opinion
Herbert E. Juelich v. United States Board of Parole
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 1971No. 18531_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a motion 1 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois, claiming that the United States Board of Parole incorrectly determined his parole eligibility date and asking that the Parole Board be enjoined from functioning on grounds of incompetence and that the procedures followed by the Parole Boards are unconstitutional.
Petitioner states he is confined in the United States penitentiary at Marion, Illinois, .in the custody, of the Attorney General of the United States; that he is now serving a sentence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harold Martin Brest v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Spring-Field, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Walter Campbell v. Frank J. Pate, Warden, and Charles F. Kinney, Chairman of the Board of Pardon and ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Andrew G. W. Frederick A/K/A J. W. G. FerlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Melvin Walker v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Gregory v. United States Board of ParoleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Bridge v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Persico v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1977
- Bridge v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Ornitz v. RobuckDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1973