Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Baker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1919No. 9,831PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; James W. Fortune, Judge. Action by Harry W. Baker against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

This is an action by appellee against appellant, based on a claim for additional compensation for services rendered by him as brakeman during a pe*333riod of time'in which he was regularly employed by appellant at a fixed compensation as porter on appellant’s passenger trains, running from Louisville, Kentucky, to Logansport, Indiana. Issues were joined, and the cause was tried before a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of appellee together with its answers to certain interrogatories submitted by the court. After motion by appellant for judgment on such answers notwithstanding the general…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MarableIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Mingo Lime & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. ConeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. McGuire v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Trojnar v. BihlmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API