Legal Opinion
Danielle Krimbow v. Life Insurance Company of the Southwest
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 15, 2026No. 5:23-cv-04068Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIELLE KRIMBOW, Case No. 23-cv-04068-PCP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CLASS CERTIFICATION v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 108, 109, 110, 117, 121 10 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST, 11 Defendant. 12 13 In this action, plaintiff Danielle Krimbow asserts a single claim against defendant Life 14 Insurance Company of the Southwest (LICS) under California’s Unfair Competition Law. She 15 alleges that LICS charged fees for certain add-on benefits to deferred indexed annuity plans that it 16 offered to California public-school…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Ramírez v. ArlequínCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.