Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. 72nd Street Associates

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jane S. Solomon, J.

On September 23, 1998, plaintiffs Frank Rodgers and his *800wife Kathleen Rodgers prevailed in their claims arising from an accident Mr. Rodgers had while working on the premises of the defendant.1 Because some future damages awarded by the jury must be paid periodically under CPLR article 50-B, 5041 et seq., a hearing thereunder was set for a date two months after the verdict, and each side was directed to submit its recommendations prior thereto.

While CPLR 5041 is intimidating, it is not, however, impossible of application. The steps set forth in CPLR 5041…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Adamy v. ZiriakusNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Petrides v. GoodgoldNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Silvestri v. SmallbergNew York Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API