Legal Opinion
City of Dayton v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1999No. C.A. Case No. 17507. T.C. Case No. 98 CR 9505PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frederick N. Young, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Gilbert A. Davis, appeals his convictions on one count of menacing by stalking in violation of R.C. 2903.211, and one count of aggravated menacing in violation of R.C.G.O. 135.05(A). 1 In his sole assignment of error, he claims both convictions were unsupported by sufficient evidence and against the manifest weight of the evidence. We affirm.
According to the evidence presented by the prosecution, the defense.having presented none, the events culminating in Davis’s convictions have their genesis in 1996, when he was a second-year law student at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Dayton v. DunniganOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. SchwartzOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Caban v. Ransome, 08 Ma 36 (3-4-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Jenkins v. Jenkins, Unpublished Decision (2-1-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Holloway v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- R.G. v. R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.