Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Kizer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 16, 1992No. CV90-063; CA A67063PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*208WARREN, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his claim for misapplication of public funds under ORS 294.100(2) for failure to allege facts sufficient to constitute a claim for relief. ORCP 21A(8). We affirm.
Plaintiff alleges that he is a property owner and registered voter in McMinnville School District No. 40 (District), has children in a school administered by District and pays taxes for support of District’s schools. Defendants are public officials who are members of the District School Board (Board). District’s school teachers are represented by the Mid-Valley Bargaining Council…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Keltner v. Washington CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Skinner v. KeeleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Seattle v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- City v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Sullivan v. KizerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992