Legal Opinion
Leadam v. Ringgold & Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided November 7, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This is a bill in equity to enjoin the infringement by defendants of patent No. 621,423, issued on March 21, 1899, to Lionel H. Leadam, and for an account of the profits and damages. The patent relates to improvements in a boottree, and consists of a wooden device which snugly fits the interior of a boot or shoe, keeping the same stretched or distended and imparting to it a shapely appearance. The suit was originally instituted by the complainants, Lionel H. Leadam, inventor, and Agnes Leadam, his wife, to whom the patent had been assigned, by the former, and who on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- New York Grape Sugar Co. v. Buffalo Grape Sugar Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1883
- Fitz v. LeadamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1904
- Curtis Davis & Co. v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herman v. Detroit Shipbuilding Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
- Auto Spring Repairer Co. v. GrinbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1912
- New Jersey Shoe Tree & Last Co. v. Baker Shoe Tree Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- New Jersey Shoe Tree & Last Co. v. Baker Shoe Tree Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908