R.L.R. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.
The Petitioner, R.L.R., seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the lower court to reverse its order directing the minor Petitioner’s Attorneys Ad Litem to disclose the Petitioner’s whereabouts, where the Petitioner had given the information to his attorneys and requested them not to disclose the information. The trial court’s order requiring the attorneys to disclose this information recognizes the attorney-client privilege but finds the disclosure is required “for the proper administration of justice.” We treat this as a petition for writ of certiorari, grant the writ, and quash the order on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. BauerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Department of Social & Health Services v. LuakWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- R.D.N. v. A.M.N.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- West Bend Mutual Insurance v. HigginsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Office of the Public Defender v. LakicevicDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Tina Lasonya Brown v. State of Florida & Tina Lasonya Brown v. Mark S. Inch, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2020
- WILLIAM HAMILTON ARTHUR ARCHITECT, INC. v. JEFFREY C. SCHNEIDERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022