Legal Opinion
Beebe v. Randall
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 26, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The jury returned verdicts for the plaintiffs, husband and wife, for damages sustained when the automobile that was being operated by Mrs. Beebe, with her husband sitting beside her on the front seat, collided with an automobile operated by the defendant. The collision occurred in this Commonwealth on August 17, 1936, at about 7:45 o’clock in the evening, “Eastern Daylight Time,” on the three lane concrete road between Pittsfield and Albany. It was daylight and the surface of the road was dry. From the point of collision there is an unobstructed view easterly along the highway toward…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Laffey v. MullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Anderson v. Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Bessey v. SalemmeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Germaine v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- McFaden v. NordblomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Connors v. WickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Gregory v. Maine Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.