Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Connolly
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 14, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The objection to the fees charged by the attorneys for the executors and trustees is overruled. The request of the *94corporate executor- and trustee for leave to resign was withdrawn upon the hearing. It may continue to function subject to its right to renew the application to resign by supplemental motion or order to show cause in the accounting proceeding. The decree to be entered herein may contain an appropriate provision to that effect. For the further guidance of all the parties to this proceeding, it should be plainly recorded that if the corporate trustee resigns, a new…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Losey v. . StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Woodbridge v. . BockesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Weeks v. . FrankelNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ArnoltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of RichardsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Accounting of WadeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of RiggsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Accounting of PantaleoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- In re the Appointment of a Successor Trustee of the Trust under the Will of PhippsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955